References

MODELLING OF FATIGUE-TYPE SEISMIC DAMAGE FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS


[1] ANSI/ANS-58.21-2003, External Events PRA Methodology, March 2003.

[2] J. S. Bendat, Probability Functions for Random Responses, NASA Report on Contract NAS-5-4590, 1964.

[3] Criterion for Determining Exceedance of the Operating Basis Earthquake, EPRI NP-5930, July 1988.

[4] T. Dirlik, Application of Computers in Fatigue Analysis, University of Warwick Thesis, 1985.

[5] S. Ferson, V. Kreinovich, L. Ginzburg, D. S. Myers and K. Sentz, Constructing Probability Boxes and Dempster-Shafer Structures, Unabridged Version, SAND2002-4015, Unlimited Release, Printed January 2003.

[6] T. J. Katona, Options for the treatment of uncertainty in seismic probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants, Pollack Periodica 5(1) (2010), 121-136.

[7] T. J. Katona, Interpretation of the physical meaning of the cumulative absolute velocity, Pollack Periodica 6(1) (2011), 9-106.

[8] R. P. Kennedy and M. K. Ravindra, Seismic fragilities for nuclear power plant risk studies, Nuclear Engineering and Design 79 (1984), 47-68.

[9] A. Papoulis, Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes, McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Ltd., 1965.

[10] Preliminary Findings and Lessons Learned from the 16 July 2007 Earthquake at Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP, Mission Report, IAEA, Vienna, August 2007.

[11] Tae Kim Sang, Tadjiev Damir and Tae Yang Hyun, Fatigue Life Prediction under Random Loading Conditions in 7475–T7351 Aluminum Alloy using the RMS Model, International Journal of Damage Mechanics 15 (2006), 89-102.

[12] W. T. Tucker and S. Ferson, Probability Bounds Analysis in Environmental Risk Assessments, Applied Biomathematics, 100 North Country Road, Setauket, New York, 2003.
www.ramas.com/pbawhite.pdf